Matt
Other 
Posts: 5,757
|
Post by Matt on Apr 29, 2015 17:38:16 GMT -5
Actually is actually great to use because it is one of the few walk related stats readily available for pitchers from all eras and it carries over eras much better then the other available stat which is BBs. Thanks though lol. Problem is here certain parties don't understand the meaning of the word borderline. Im waiting for said people to argue Wade Boggs should be rated good in homers because of his 24 in 1987 and Brady Anderson should be brilliant because of his 50 in 96. OOTP values walks higher than real life does. Guys who are borderline in walks should DEFINITELY get the bump at all times. Otherwise we're going to have a league full of Good walks hitters walking 90+ times. GABL I would definitely agree. This league I haven't noticed as much. The B/B walk/HR guys that succeeded in that league haven't as much here that I've noticed. |
|
|
|
Post by Sha-Le Unique on Apr 29, 2015 18:49:36 GMT -5
Plus, does Adam bite the bullet with Carew? Or does he wait a few decades for Mauer or Johan? If he does itll be his 2nd fpr with killebrew....first team to do 2....how many points would he have left and wasnt the limit 2 per team? Yeah the limit either 2 or 3 depending on number of points used on each |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 29, 2015 20:28:38 GMT -5
I typically used 20 games for position eligibility. Not set in stone, just the way I did it.
|
|
|
|
Post by Sha-Le Unique on Apr 29, 2015 21:02:39 GMT -5
I typically used 20 games for position eligibility. Not set in stone, just the way I did it. Same with what I've done in LBB, but if someone had a very brief career, I'd include every position they played in, even if it was for just 1 game. |
|
|
|
Post by Danny Glover on Apr 30, 2015 4:32:34 GMT -5
Shale's a nice guy
|
|
|
|
Post by Danny Glover on May 1, 2015 1:02:26 GMT -5
Hello
|
|
|
|
Post by The Vermont Bombers on May 1, 2015 12:47:15 GMT -5
Lol at using all time bb/9 as a reference point. If a guy is borderline he should get it. Chances are he's not going to maximize anyways. Actually is actually great to use because it is one of the few walk related stats readily available for pitchers from all eras and it carries over eras much better then the other available stat which is BBs. Thanks though lol. Problem is here certain parties don't understand the meaning of the word borderline. Im waiting for said people to argue Wade Boggs should be rated good in homers because of his 24 in 1987 and Brady Anderson should be brilliant because of his 50 in 96. If they wanted Brady Anderson to have a BR in HR because of one season, they wouldn't understand the meaning of the term "outlier", either. Lol. Adam hasn't decided yet. |
|
|
|
Post by Boston Red Sox on May 1, 2015 13:25:26 GMT -5
I feel like we should be using a 7 year peak to grade. Not career.
|
|
|
|
Post by Danny Glover on May 1, 2015 16:38:17 GMT -5
I feel like we should be using a 7 year peak to grade. Not career. How does OOTP say to do it? |
|
|
|
Post by Boston Red Sox on May 1, 2015 17:23:12 GMT -5
It doesn't?
|
|
|
|
Post by CSCommish on May 1, 2015 17:42:56 GMT -5
yea, OOTP doesn't "say" anything for anything. That's why we have these gripes though, I'm considering everyone's comments. I will be doing some bumps for sure, but not all of them and not to inflate talent too much. Palmer will benefit from near-ready ratings.
|
|
|
|
Post by Danny Glover on May 3, 2015 11:04:42 GMT -5
I just want a top 5 pick that's not gonna die lol
|
|
bigmark
General Manager 
Chicago White Sox
Posts: 6,177
|
Post by bigmark on May 3, 2015 13:19:38 GMT -5
I just want a top 5 pick that's not gonna die lol it has protection and points as well...so even if they do die you can save them |
|
|
|
Post by Boston Red Sox on May 4, 2015 9:02:03 GMT -5
I'm finishing up but I've got work at 11-2 so I'll have the file to Chris at 4pm today.
On a side note. Why do draft makers have a hard on for giving guys with good speed in real life awful speed combos?
We know exactly how speed works in this game. We should be giving guys like Carew better than B/C stealing. That's like a 50% success rate in the game.
|
|
|
|
Post by Boston Red Sox on May 4, 2015 9:03:01 GMT -5
He should have C/B not B/C and I always see people doing this in drafts and they know it's not the way the game works.
|
|
|
|
Post by Boston Red Sox on May 4, 2015 9:03:52 GMT -5
C/B = 30 steals 65-75% success rate
B/C = 20 steals 50% success rate
please stop gutting speed.
|
|
|
|
Post by Boston Red Sox on May 4, 2015 9:17:23 GMT -5
Same thing here with Dave Nelson.
A/B speed = 60% success and about 50 steals
You're making stealing completely unviable with these ratings.
|
|
|
|
Post by CSCommish on May 4, 2015 12:22:39 GMT -5
Same thing here with Dave Nelson. A/B speed = 60% success and about 50 steals You're making stealing completely unviable with these ratings. Where are you getting the success rates from? If you can prove a correlation between the #/# and propose a realistic schedule, I'd be willing to produce another OOTP5 Ratings Chart, but for speed/stealing only --- or just expand on the graphic so it's both on 1 graphic, instead of 2 --- and I'd be happy to follow along with it, give you 10 points for producing it. And can you check to see how the ratings the current players in the game are holding up? For example, how is Aparcio doing? |
|
|
|
Post by Boston Red Sox on May 4, 2015 14:20:03 GMT -5
Aparicio got 2 PD's to his stealing lol
|
|
|
|
Post by Boston Red Sox on May 4, 2015 14:20:47 GMT -5
Or maybe just one. Still he was A/B at one point and terrible on the bases.
|
|
|
|
Post by Boston Red Sox on May 4, 2015 14:21:53 GMT -5
Stealing % is based on stealing ability
Speed also affects stealing. Guys with A speed but C ability will steal 40 a year, but they'll get caught 25 times. A guy with C speed and A ability can steal 40-50 a year while getting caught 10 or less times.
|
|
Matt
Other
Posts: 5,757
|
Post by Matt on May 4, 2015 14:51:05 GMT -5
Buford is B/B
2 years ago he was 50/58
Last year he was 56/77.
Nagashima is B/A
2 years ago 44/57
Last season 51/59
Just for another reference point.
|
|
Darryl
New Member
California Angels
Posts: 2,412
|
Post by Darryl on May 4, 2015 15:34:27 GMT -5
All this can also be influenced how you set the players steal rate as well and where you hit them.
|
|
Matt
Other
Posts: 5,757
|
Post by Matt on May 4, 2015 15:37:37 GMT -5
All this can also be influenced how you set the players steal rate as well and where you hit them. I have those two all the way up. Team I think is close to the top as well |
|
|
|
Post by soonerfantu on May 4, 2015 16:06:59 GMT -5
All this can also be influenced how you set the players steal rate as well and where you hit them. Agreed. An awful lot of variable to try to come up with some table that is consistent. |
|
