|
|
Post by Sha-Le Unique on Oct 25, 2015 14:29:47 GMT -5
Chris asked me to make this poll just now. Should we able to use points to pay for CONSISTENCY, CLUTCH and TEAM LEADERSHIP ability increases or no? Please vote!
|
|
|
|
Post by Boston Red Sox on Oct 25, 2015 14:46:03 GMT -5
anyone who votes against this is literally against change just to be against change. This does nothing but help everyone fix their under-performing players possibly.
|
|
|
|
Post by Boston Red Sox on Oct 25, 2015 14:46:22 GMT -5
it's not even a guarantee it'll help to upgrade these it's a risk
|
|
Darryl
New Member
California Angels
Posts: 2,412
|
Post by Darryl on Oct 25, 2015 16:37:10 GMT -5
anyone who votes against this is literally against change just to be against change. This does nothing but help everyone fix their under-performing players possibly. Or they live in a land called reality where not every player is clutch, or a great leader. |
|
|
|
Post by Sha-Le Unique on Oct 26, 2015 12:59:01 GMT -5
bump
|
|
|
|
Post by Danny Glover on Oct 26, 2015 13:24:07 GMT -5
anyone who votes against this is literally against change just to be against change. This does nothing but help everyone fix their under-performing players possibly. Or they live in a land called reality where not every player is clutch, or a great leader. I'd rather have a team full of good consistency and great clutch.... Can't please everyone break |
|
|
|
Post by soonerfantu on Oct 26, 2015 13:27:24 GMT -5
IF this gets voted in, I think it should have some regulations, and be a little pricey in terms of reward points.
Maybe not so much to get to the middle ranking, but to get to the top (loyal, durable, very consistent, etc), shouldn't be easy. Much like we can't get guys to Brilliant or A (range, stealing, etc).
|
|
|
|
Post by CSCommish on Oct 26, 2015 13:29:53 GMT -5
I'm not sure I would allow changes to become loyal. That would be a HUGE financial benefit to a team. If I were to think about allowing it, the loyal rating would cost AT LEAST 50 points.
|
|
|
|
Post by Sha-Le Unique on Oct 26, 2015 13:35:06 GMT -5
No I don't think there should be any changes to winning desire or loyalty at all. This is ONLY for consistency, clutch and team leadership.
|
|
|
|
Post by Sha-Le Unique on Oct 26, 2015 13:36:38 GMT -5
And I hope people weren't voting as if winning desire, loyalty and injury rating were a part of this because they weren't.
|
|
|
|
Post by Sha-Le Unique on Oct 26, 2015 13:37:29 GMT -5
I'm just going by the TIC's we do in BBSBL.
Talent Increase C (TIC) - $1.5M
- Take player intangibles to the next level.
- Consistency, team leadership skills, clutch performance
- Limitations: 1 per category, 2 per player
|
|
|
|
Post by CSCommish on Oct 26, 2015 13:48:21 GMT -5
OK, it wasn't clear to me at first, oops
|
|
|
|
Post by Danny Glover on Oct 26, 2015 13:55:05 GMT -5
I'm just going by the TIC's we do in BBSBL. Talent Increase C (TIC) - $1.5M - Take player intangibles to the next level. - Consistency, team leadership skills, clutch performance - Limitations: 1 per category, 2 per player I knew what you meant buddy |
|
|
|
Post by Danny Glover on Oct 26, 2015 13:56:03 GMT -5
I find it funny when Gm's don't want to fuck with the realizm of a Sim league
|
|
Matt
Other 
Posts: 5,757
|
Post by Matt on Oct 26, 2015 14:10:20 GMT -5
I find it funny when Gm's don't want to fuck with the realizm of a Sim league It's funny when GM's want a team full of superstars who are all loyal, very consistent and great in the clutch. |
|
|
|
Post by Boston Red Sox on Oct 26, 2015 14:15:42 GMT -5
And I hope people weren't voting as if winning desire, loyalty and injury rating were a part of this because they weren't. If they are they can't read. Which means Darryl voted no because he can't read. |
|
|
|
Post by Danny Glover on Oct 26, 2015 14:58:13 GMT -5
I find it funny when Gm's don't want to fuck with the realizm of a Sim league It's funny when GM's want a team full of superstars who are all loyal, very consistent and great in the clutch. Why wouldn't a Gm want to field a team full of superstars??? Intangibles play a part in OOTP.... |
|
|
|
Post by Danny Glover on Oct 26, 2015 14:59:54 GMT -5
OOTP wouldn't have made these intangibles adjustable of they didn't want you to take full advantage of them...
|
|
|
|
Post by CSCommish on Oct 26, 2015 15:12:38 GMT -5
OOTP wouldn't have made these intangibles adjustable of they didn't want you to take full advantage of them... I don't think they are made to be adjustable by the owners. Otherwise why not make everyone 15's in home runs just because we feel like it! |
|
|
|
Post by soonerfantu on Oct 26, 2015 15:21:21 GMT -5
OOTP wouldn't have made these intangibles adjustable of they didn't want you to take full advantage of them... Please tell me, quantitatively (you'll have to google that one break), how much those impact the game. |
|
|
|
Post by CSCommish on Oct 26, 2015 15:24:57 GMT -5
OOTP wouldn't have made these intangibles adjustable of they didn't want you to take full advantage of them... Please tell me, quantitatively (you'll have to google that one break), how much those impact the game. Wouldn't it be better to just have me make everyone the same? lol |
|
Darryl
New Member
California Angels
Posts: 2,412
|
Post by Darryl on Oct 26, 2015 15:31:10 GMT -5
And I hope people weren't voting as if winning desire, loyalty and injury rating were a part of this because they weren't. If they are they can't read. Which means Darryl voted no because he can't read.Lo Lol you talking about the intelligence of anyone else is priceless. |
|
bigmark
General Manager 
Chicago White Sox
Posts: 6,177
|
Post by bigmark on Oct 26, 2015 15:39:55 GMT -5
OOTP wouldn't have made these intangibles adjustable of they didn't want you to take full advantage of them... or they made them adjustable so that not all players are the same? ....fact is not every player is a leader...not every player is clutch.... if this does somehow go through...it better be an insanely high cost of points |
|
Darryl
New Member
California Angels
Posts: 2,412
|
Post by Darryl on Oct 26, 2015 15:42:36 GMT -5
I find it funny when Gm's don't want to fuck with the realizm of a Sim league Over here it's why do we have to be realistic and in the rating thread it's we need to make them better so it's realistic. |
|
|
|
Post by Danny Glover on Oct 26, 2015 15:55:01 GMT -5
OOTP wouldn't have made these intangibles adjustable of they didn't want you to take full advantage of them... or they made them adjustable so that not all players are the same? ....fact is not every player is a leader...not every player is clutch.... if this does somehow go through...it better be an insanely high cost of points Obviously they would cost a premium... |
|
