|
|
Post by CSCommish on Oct 28, 2013 13:04:02 GMT -5
Reservation Discussions
|
|
|
|
Post by Boston Red Sox on Oct 29, 2013 4:28:23 GMT -5
I'd like to get a couple ratings on players if possible.
Rico Petrocelli
Wade Boggs
Jim Rice
Nomar Garciaparra
Pedro Martinez
|
|
|
|
Post by Boston Red Sox on Nov 1, 2013 14:05:11 GMT -5
Can I get the numbers on these?
|
|
|
|
Post by CSCommish on Nov 1, 2013 15:53:21 GMT -5
No.
|
|
|
|
Post by CSCommish on Nov 1, 2013 16:04:18 GMT -5
Rico Petrocelli (1961):
Value: 2 * (10.0 + 5.0 + 4.8 + 4.1 + 3.8) = 55.4 = 55
Ratings: A/A/F/G/G/G with D speed, E steals, C range
Jim Rice (1971):
Value: 2 * (7.6 + 6.4 + 5.6 + 5.5 + 5.2) = 60.6 = 61
Ratings: G/G/G/B/F/A with C speed, C steals, C range
Wade Boggs (1976):
Value: 2 * (9.1 + 8.4 + 8.2 + 8.2 + 7.9) = 83.6 = 84
Ratings: B/B/A/F/G/B with D speed, E steals, C range
Pedro Martinez (1988):
Value: 2 * (11.7 + 9.7 + 9.0 + 8.0 + 7.2) = 91.2 = 91
Ratings: B/G/B/G/B with B endurance
Anthony Ramon Garcia-Parra (1994):
Value: 2 * (7.4 + 7.1 + 6.8 + 6.6 + 6.6) = 69.0 = 69
Ratings: B/B/G/G/F/G with C speed, B steals, C range
|
|
|
|
Post by Boston Red Sox on Nov 1, 2013 17:57:54 GMT -5
So there is no way to get Boggs/Pedro/Nomar?
|
|
|
|
Post by CSCommish on Nov 1, 2013 18:44:12 GMT -5
Boggs: 10 + 84
Pedro: 10 + 91
Nomar: 10 + 69
That's 274 before draft day jumps. Definitely won't happen. Even just Boggs and Pedro might not happen, since that's 195 leaving you with 5 points to jump. You might be able to do Pedro and Nomar or Pedro and Rice.
|
|
|
|
Post by Boston Red Sox on Nov 6, 2013 16:47:04 GMT -5
I'm gonna go ahead and reserve Pedro and Nomar now.
|
|
|
|
Post by CSCommish on Nov 6, 2013 18:04:59 GMT -5
Pedro: 10 + 91
Nomar: 10 + 69
That's 180 points; so you just have to make sure you're not jumping more than 10 spots in each draft, or 20 total. Otherwise you will have to trade up to a position where that's possible.
|
|
|
|
Post by Boston Red Sox on Nov 6, 2013 18:38:33 GMT -5
That's not too hard. I plan on tanking leading up to 88
|
|
K.
Other 
Posts: 301
|
Post by K. on Nov 7, 2013 3:51:38 GMT -5
Tanking is not allowed.
|
|
Matt
Other
Posts: 5,757
|
Post by Matt on Nov 7, 2013 9:39:41 GMT -5
It will happen until there are rules against it. |
|
|
|
Post by Boston Red Sox on Nov 7, 2013 11:17:36 GMT -5
Because I definitely meant going out of my way to lose. Of course I meant I don't plan on competing in that time frame. Why not go tell Spencer the rules when he said this a week ago. |
|
|
|
Post by Boston Red Sox on Nov 7, 2013 11:18:34 GMT -5
Ill tank for my 80s guys. Wanna compete for awhile. This is a perfect window. Go bother him or don't come after me. |
|
K.
Other
Posts: 301
|
Post by K. on Nov 7, 2013 15:41:29 GMT -5
I'll go after anyone who claims he will if I see it. You're not the first and you're not the last.
|
|
K.
Other
Posts: 301
|
Post by K. on Nov 7, 2013 15:42:07 GMT -5
Because I definitely meant going out of my way to lose. Of course I meant I don't plan on competing in that time frame. Why not go tell Spencer the rules when he said this a week ago. How can you already know you won't be competitive in the 80s, 3 decades from now? |
|
K.
Other
Posts: 301
|
Post by K. on Nov 7, 2013 15:43:13 GMT -5
It will happen until there are rules against it. Commish has the prerogative to act in the case of tanking. People already stating they will is thus something I will happily bring to the attention of the Commish. |
|
|
|
Post by soonerfantu on Nov 7, 2013 16:34:25 GMT -5
Has any team ever won after tanking? Sorry, but no one or even two prospects is going to launch a team to the playoffs if the rest of their roster is bad enough to land the 1st pick.
Not that I'm not against tanking, just stating that it is a terrible strategy to try and build a winner.
|
|
|
|
Post by CSCommish on Nov 8, 2013 7:56:23 GMT -5
I tanked in GABL and have struggled to get back into it. Almost all of my prospects from that mega pool in 2012? have crapped out. I wish I never did it.
|
|
|
|
Post by Boston Red Sox on Nov 8, 2013 8:22:12 GMT -5
What a snitch.
|
|
K.
Other
Posts: 301
|
Post by K. on Nov 8, 2013 11:05:37 GMT -5
Has any team ever won after tanking? Sorry, but no one or even two prospects is going to launch a team to the playoffs if the rest of their roster is bad enough to land the 1st pick. Not that I'm not against tanking, just stating that it is a terrible strategy to try and build a winner. I've seen teams be wildly succesful in doing so but it takes more than 2 seasons obviously. And as with everything in OOTP5: you need to be lucky with your developments. |
|
|
|
Post by CSCommish on May 29, 2017 11:26:47 GMT -5
I'm gonna go ahead and reserve Pedro and Nomar now. Aww. |
|
|
|
Post by CSCommish on May 29, 2017 11:29:36 GMT -5
Red Sox reserve 3B Wade Boggs.
Cost will be 10 + (2 * (9.1 + 8.4 + 8.3 + 8.2 + 8.0) = 84) + Max 78 (26 * 3) = 172 points
Red Sox will forfeit all 3 picks in 1977.
|
|
|
|
Post by Boston Red Sox on May 8, 2018 16:13:57 GMT -5
Lol K was such a dickhead. I can still reserve someone worth less than 52 points after getting 25 back from Boggs right CSCommish? |
|
