|
|
Post by CSCommish on Jun 29, 2013 22:45:41 GMT -5
I want this league to be for the people, by the people. Therefore, I am going to ask you when we should start, broken in two (2) parts. First, let's get a range of years, then I will post another poll in a week or so to pick the season.
Feel free to post why you made your selection.
|
|
|
|
Post by Sha-Le Unique on Jun 30, 2013 16:22:19 GMT -5
I want this league to be for the people, by the people. Therefore, I am going to ask you when we should start, broken in two (2) parts. First, let's get a range of years, then I will post another poll in a week or so to pick the season. Feel free to post why you made your selection. Imo, it really depends on how much interest there is right away. |
|
|
|
Post by Boston Red Sox on Jul 1, 2013 3:03:16 GMT -5
The earlier the better because that means the longer we have until we hit today.
|
|
|
|
Post by steve on Jul 1, 2013 11:43:30 GMT -5
Doesn't really matter to me. I like sometime around 1950.
|
|
|
|
Post by CSCommish on Jul 1, 2013 11:45:59 GMT -5
Literally no love in this poll.
|
|
|
|
Post by steve on Jul 1, 2013 11:48:51 GMT -5
Maybe I should push for a couple years later so I can start with Hank Aaron...
|
|
|
|
Post by steve on Jul 1, 2013 11:49:48 GMT -5
Aaron and Mathews would be a nice pair to start with...
|
|
|
|
Post by CSCommish on Jul 1, 2013 11:57:30 GMT -5
Maybe I should push for a couple years later so I can start with Hank Aaron... Aaron was signed by the Boston Braves on June 14, 1952. |
|
|
|
Post by steve on Jul 1, 2013 11:58:54 GMT -5
Maybe I should push for a couple years later so I can start with Hank Aaron... Aaron was signed by the Boston Braves on June 14, 1952. True. I was referring to my last post of 1950. |
|
|
|
Post by steve on Jul 1, 2013 11:59:19 GMT -5
Damn it Proboards.
|
|
|
|
Post by CSCommish on Jul 1, 2013 12:04:24 GMT -5
Well so far it looks like 1950-1954 is getting the vote, but we're probably half way through the vote.
Later, I will have a vote for the actual season start date. So you will have an opportunity to make the case for 1952, 1953 or 1954...that is, if 1950-1954 is indeed selected.
|
|
Matt
Other 
Posts: 5,757
|
Post by Matt on Jul 1, 2013 15:49:52 GMT -5
The earlier I get Stan the Man, the happier I'll be!
|
|
|
|
Post by peted on Jul 1, 2013 16:11:17 GMT -5
1939 -
seems like a good time!!!
|
|
|
|
Post by Ashes on Jul 1, 2013 16:52:03 GMT -5
No preference in start date either heh, but I went with the earlier.
|
|
|
|
Post by CSCommish on Jul 1, 2013 17:02:36 GMT -5
I'm surprised at how even this vote is.
|
|
|
|
Post by steve on Jul 1, 2013 17:21:26 GMT -5
nobody likes 46-49
|
|
|
|
Post by peted on Jul 1, 2013 19:17:51 GMT -5
The earlier the better.
It's very hard fielding a team in the old days, so little "predictable talent"
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 2, 2013 17:57:14 GMT -5
i would like to start at 1950 but not a big deal whichever direction we go in.
|
|
|
|
Post by CSCommish on Jul 2, 2013 18:13:07 GMT -5
We are going to go with the 1950-1954 time period. Locked.
|
|
