RoyalsGM
General Manager
Kansas City Royals
Posts: 4,594
|
Post by RoyalsGM on Feb 14, 2017 22:32:11 GMT -5
The vote is advisory only to commish and non-binding. Please voice your opinion in the thread as well.
|
|
|
Post by Danny Glover on Feb 14, 2017 22:43:14 GMT -5
I'm not against the expansion......I am however against all the extra work behind it, like making a list and such. Not really looking to lose players I need lol
|
|
Matt
Other
Posts: 5,757
|
Post by Matt on Feb 14, 2017 23:02:21 GMT -5
I voted no at this point. However of we can find active owners for two more teams, I'll happily change my vote to yes
|
|
|
Post by Sha-Le Unique on Feb 15, 2017 0:31:28 GMT -5
Another option could always be to change the White Sox to the Blue Jays, move them to the AL East, move the Indians back to the AL Central and then call it a day. Seems like a solution with a minimal amount of work included.
|
|
bigmark
General Manager
Chicago White Sox
Posts: 6,176
|
Post by bigmark on Feb 15, 2017 11:04:56 GMT -5
Another option could always be to change the White Sox to the Blue Jays, move them to the AL East, move the Indians back to the AL Central and then call it a day. Seems like a solution with a minimal amount of work included. But after I draft Frank Thomas
|
|
Spencer
General Manager
Posts: 5,920
|
Post by Spencer on Feb 15, 2017 18:29:42 GMT -5
I love the historical aspect of the league but at this point I dont think I wanna do it.
|
|
Spencer
General Manager
Posts: 5,920
|
Post by Spencer on Feb 15, 2017 18:30:13 GMT -5
I didnt vote btw since the vote is rather pointless. The conversation is more influential.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 15, 2017 20:53:14 GMT -5
Everyone knows how my vote goes. I have always preferred the historical accuracy. I would be VERY opposed to changing he White Sox to the Jays, I hate seeing original franchises just "done away with". I don't feel like we have a problem with inactive GM's in this league. If we did I guess I would give it more thought.
|
|