|
|
Post by CSCommish on Dec 31, 2013 7:47:22 GMT -5
I made slight modifications to the FPR Rules.
I am going to allow up to 100 FPR points to be cashed in to Reward points, but no more than 25 points may be cashed in at a time, no more than once per season. It was 50. I think this will give flexibility to owners as they see fit.
I also reduced the loyalty refunds from 5-10-15 points for the player's 10th, 15th and 20th year anniversary back to 5-5-5 points; I had been thinking about it and the maximum 30 point refunds seemed too generous.
|
|
|
|
Post by soonerfantu on Dec 31, 2013 8:16:13 GMT -5
This changes EVERYTHING.
Sending my men back to the bat cave to do further analysis.
|
|
Matt
Other 
Posts: 5,757
|
Post by Matt on Dec 31, 2013 10:40:45 GMT -5
So now there is no real reward for keeping a guy around his whole career.  |
|
bigmark
General Manager 
Chicago White Sox
Posts: 6,176
|
Post by bigmark on Dec 31, 2013 10:50:40 GMT -5
I dunno about the whole fpr transfer to reward points...what's stopping me besides not being a jerk from trading in as much of CWS fpr points as I can while I'm here before leaving for Toronto.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 31, 2013 11:26:14 GMT -5
I think in situations like yours where you're simply running the team before taking over the team you REALLY want there has to be a "what's best for the league" type of scenario in place, where maybe the commissioner, or someone appointed by him goes and looks at potential player reservations for a given team and then makes sure the current GM of the team is acting in it's best interest. I would say Frank Thomas is a must for the Chi-Sox. Fisk potentially. I guess if you could say Thomas is the only must have, then you would have plenty of points any how. I just don't think it's best for the league to let interim type GM's screw up a team for future GM's.
|
|
|
|
Post by Sha-Le Unique on Dec 31, 2013 11:39:30 GMT -5
I think in situations like yours where you're simply running the team before taking over the team you REALLY want there has to be a "what's best for the league" type of scenario in place, where maybe the commissioner, or someone appointed by him goes and looks at potential player reservations for a given team and then makes sure the current GM of the team is acting in it's best interest. I would say Frank Thomas is a must for the Chi-Sox. Fisk potentially. I guess if you could say Thomas is the only must have, then you would have plenty of points any how. I just don't think it's best for the league to let interim type GM's screw up a team for future GM's. Yeah I'm gonna take Stargell in 1958 for future Pirates GM. It really will be a no-brainer. |
|
|
|
Post by CSCommish on Dec 31, 2013 12:07:43 GMT -5
I think in situations like yours where you're simply running the team before taking over the team you REALLY want there has to be a "what's best for the league" type of scenario in place, where maybe the commissioner, or someone appointed by him goes and looks at potential player reservations for a given team and then makes sure the current GM of the team is acting in it's best interest. I would say Frank Thomas is a must for the Chi-Sox. Fisk potentially. I guess if you could say Thomas is the only must have, then you would have plenty of points any how. I just don't think it's best for the league to let interim type GM's screw up a team for future GM's. Yeah I'm gonna take Stargell in 1958 for future Pirates GM. It really will be a no-brainer. Oh you think you're going to not end up with the #1 overall pick lol |
|
|
|
Post by CSCommish on Dec 31, 2013 12:09:02 GMT -5
I think in situations like yours where you're simply running the team before taking over the team you REALLY want there has to be a "what's best for the league" type of scenario in place, where maybe the commissioner, or someone appointed by him goes and looks at potential player reservations for a given team and then makes sure the current GM of the team is acting in it's best interest. I would say Frank Thomas is a must for the Chi-Sox. Fisk potentially. I guess if you could say Thomas is the only must have, then you would have plenty of points any how. I just don't think it's best for the league to let interim type GM's screw up a team for future GM's. Matt hit it on the head; I will do whatever it takes to do what is best for the league. |
|
|
|
Post by steve on Dec 31, 2013 12:54:35 GMT -5
Yeah I'm gonna take Stargell in 1958 for future Pirates GM. It really will be a no-brainer. Oh you think you're going to not end up with the #1 overall pick lol lol is..<input maxlength="8" size="8"> |
|
|
|
Post by Sha-Le Unique on Dec 31, 2013 12:55:36 GMT -5
Yeah I'm gonna take Stargell in 1958 for future Pirates GM. It really will be a no-brainer. Oh you think you're going to not end up with the #1 overall pick lol lulz who knows. My young guys will be up by then at least. |
|
|
|
Post by Sha-Le Unique on Dec 31, 2013 12:56:44 GMT -5
Whoever gets the Pirates after me should have a good team to work with
|
|
bigmark
General Manager
Chicago White Sox
Posts: 6,176
|
Post by bigmark on Dec 31, 2013 14:20:26 GMT -5
Who knows...as much as I'm a jays fan if I get attached to my team/player i may just stay chi sox (and draft a bunch of jays when I can :-) ) Frank Thomas played for the Jays lol
|
|
|
|
Post by Sha-Le Unique on Dec 31, 2013 14:27:45 GMT -5
Who knows...as much as I'm a jays fan if I get attached to my team/player i may just stay chi sox (and draft a bunch of jays when I can :-) ) Frank Thomas played for the Jays lol Very briefly lol |
|
