Reddington
General Manager 
Atlanta Braves
Posts: 17,853 
|
Post by Reddington on Jun 9, 2018 9:49:35 GMT -5
Current
Career Event-based Points
Player hits 2000/2500/3000th hit: 2/3/5 pts
Player gets 300/400/500th HR: 2/3/5 pts
Pitcher gets 200/250/300th W: 2/3/5 pts
Pitcher gets 300/400/500th SV: 2/3/5 pts
Suggest it be changed to
Player hits 2000/2500/3000th/3500 hit: 10/15/20/30 pts
Player gets 300/400/500/600th HR: 10/15/20/25 pts
Pitcher gets 200/250/300/350th W: 10/15/20/30 pts
Pitcher gets 300/400/500/600th SV: 10/15/20/25 pts
|
|
|
|
Post by Boston Red Sox on Jun 9, 2018 9:54:54 GMT -5
Yeah makes sense that they should be worth more
|
|
Reddington
General Manager
Atlanta Braves
Posts: 17,853
|
Post by Reddington on Jun 9, 2018 18:03:20 GMT -5
A couple more suggestions
hitters
Stolen Bases 500/750/1000 10/15/20 points
Walks 1500/2000 10/15 points
RBIs 1500/2000 10/15 points
runs 1500/2000 10/15 points
pitchers
Stikeouts 3500/4000/5000 15/20/40 points
shutouts 30/50/70 15/20/40 points
|
|
|
|
Post by Boston Red Sox on Jun 9, 2018 18:21:48 GMT -5
I've never seen an ootp player get 1k steals. Most i ever saw fully ootp was 993 in gabl
|
|
Reddington
General Manager
Atlanta Braves
Posts: 17,853
|
Post by Reddington on Jun 9, 2018 20:40:15 GMT -5
I've never seen an ootp player get 1k steals. Most i ever saw fully ootp was 993 in gabl it's gonna happen only 9 to go... and he's only 35... doubt he'll break Ricky's MLB record though www.hoffbl.com/leaguesite/ |
|
Reddington
General Manager
Atlanta Braves
Posts: 17,853
|
Post by Reddington on Jun 12, 2018 11:43:55 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by tadontask on Jun 12, 2018 12:09:49 GMT -5
Does the player have to be on the same team for these milestones? It would seem off to me that a player can reach a significant milestone for a new team and get rewarded, where the original team that developed the player and had him for 90% of his career gets nothing. But I guess that's just the way the world works sometimes  |
|
Reddington
General Manager
Atlanta Braves
Posts: 17,853
|
Post by Reddington on Jun 12, 2018 12:20:53 GMT -5
Does the player have to be on the same team for these milestones? It would seem off to me that a player can reach a significant milestone for a new team and get rewarded, where the original team that developed the player and had him for 90% of his career gets nothing. But I guess that's just the way the world works sometimes the team that has him is probably the team that has been forking out points keeping their ability up...Looking at you Mr Jackson and 10PDs a year... but yeah the previous way is whoever has him at the time |
|
Spencer
General Manager
Posts: 5,922
|
Post by Spencer on Jun 12, 2018 16:17:30 GMT -5
Seems like a lot of points for arbitrary things.
|
|
|
|
Post by Boston Red Sox on Jun 12, 2018 17:47:17 GMT -5
Seems like a lot of points for arbitrary things. If you aren't getting something out of it that makes a difference there's really no point to having it at all. It's not like the league is flooded with points or anything |
|
Reddington
General Manager
Atlanta Braves
Posts: 17,853
|
Post by Reddington on Jun 12, 2018 18:10:58 GMT -5
Seems like a lot of points for arbitrary things. most players won't reach any of the milestones... and the few that do, just a random way of giving a few points here and there... as the odds of having even 2 hit a milestone the same year same team are really really reaaaaaaaaaaaaaalllllllllllllllllllyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy low |
|
Reddington
General Manager
Atlanta Braves
Posts: 17,853
|
Post by Reddington on Jun 12, 2018 18:16:37 GMT -5
and or, just make it 10 points per level with starting level and the number of whatever that takes to hit a second level
HR 300 x 100 10 points, so ever 100 HR's starting with 300 a team gets 10 points for that player
|
|
Spencer
General Manager
Posts: 5,922
|
Post by Spencer on Jun 12, 2018 22:28:32 GMT -5
I just disagree. My basketball leagues were the first i ever saw in using rewards. And they were all effort awards. Activity, articles with small freebies for everyone. I dont think getting rewarded for player performance makes sense. Its not a big deal but thays my two cents.
|
|
|
|
Post by Sha-Le Unique on Jun 13, 2018 0:37:34 GMT -5
I'm ok with whatever happens here, personally. Career stat rewards are always cool, but we do have a lot of ways to earn points as is, so I see both sides.
|
|
|
|
Post by Sha-Le Unique on Jun 13, 2018 0:40:20 GMT -5
I think it would be more reasonable to expand the current categories for career rewards than to add the other less significant categories. The only new stat that I think would make sense to add would be strikeouts for pitchers, just because starters career rewards are only represented by wins and saves of course are for closers. So yeah I say if anything, expand the current categories for 3,500 hits, 600 homers etc, and maybe add strikeouts too, but that's where I'd draw the line.
As for strikeout increments, I'd suggest 3k, 3,500 and 4k. Drysdale is gonna remain the only pitcher to reach 5k I'm calling it now.
|
|
