File Updated - 8/26/2013

[CSCommish]

Updated File & Pages to better reflect 1953 league leader ratings for batters (AVG, 2B, 3B, HR, BB, K and steals).

Moving onto pitchers, and I think we'll see a dramatic difference once I get to the younger pitchers, which I hope will "correct" the top 100 prospects list. I will begin with AVG shortly and hope to have it finished by the end of the week (couple football drafts) and then move onto 2B, HR, BB, K...then double-check the top 100 prospects.

Thanks.

[soonerfantu]

Are you going to do anything with durations? I have a couple that are questionably low, that I was going to ask about.

[CSCommish]

That should be griped

[soonerfantu]

Is there a criteria we should use?

[CSCommish]

Aug 27, 2013 13:29:49 GMT -5 soonerfantu said:

Is there a criteria we should use?

There is none that I have or aware of, so I suppose it's a judgment call. I would consider anyone who regularly started, with a couple CG's here and there to have C endurance. Those who had dozens of CG's to have B endurance. Those who were frequently at the top of the leaderboard in IP and CG to have A endurance.