|
|
Post by Boston Red Sox on Dec 18, 2015 23:49:29 GMT -5
He's obviously going to have final say lol
Why do you have to be so unwavering in even the idea of change.
|
|
|
|
Post by Boston Red Sox on Dec 18, 2015 23:51:38 GMT -5
The only things I'm looking to fix are guys who have been getting undercut due to "FUTURE SPENDING" or guys who get fucked because of a nuance in their game that fucks them here. If a pitcher has a career 3.6 ERA, but walks a lot of guys, why are we giving him fair walks when we KNOW that's not going to equate to a 3.6 ERA. Those kind of fixes. I'm not looking to break the game with Brilliants all over. You've literally just assumed that the entire time without actually asking me.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 19, 2015 11:05:58 GMT -5
I actually haven't assumed anything. If a guy is fair in walks, he should be fair in walks. If there wasn't a point system in place that allowed people to bump up talents, like LBB, that's different, but there is. Nothing personal, this is actually me just showing YOU how simple it is when you don't like how a league does things to say "that type of league doesn't interest me" and then quit. That's all I'm doing, is just saying "if this is the road we're heading down, I'm really not interested anymore." See? Simple.
|
|
|
|
Post by Boston Red Sox on Dec 19, 2015 12:00:51 GMT -5
You can't assume every player is getting a spending bump when we average 1-2 a year per team.
|
|
Darryl
New Member
California Angels
Posts: 2,412
|
Post by Darryl on Dec 19, 2015 12:25:49 GMT -5
I'll handle any drafts Matt has to miss.
You can give some all the talent in the world and it won't make a difference.
|
|
bigmark
General Manager 
Chicago White Sox
Posts: 6,177
|
Post by bigmark on Dec 19, 2015 12:35:07 GMT -5
You can't assume every player is getting a spending bump when we average 1-2 a year per team. Others get regular in game development plus we have protections for recent draftees.... Points to fix.... All these already help develop better prospects |
|
|
|
Post by Boston Red Sox on Dec 19, 2015 14:53:39 GMT -5
I already volunteered but thanks for offering and ignoring that fact like a complete asshole!
|
|
|
|
Post by Boston Red Sox on Dec 19, 2015 14:58:29 GMT -5
You can't assume every player is getting a spending bump when we average 1-2 a year per team. Others get regular in game development plus we have protections for recent draftees.... Points to fix.... All these already help develop better prospects By chance. I'm talking about giving teams the ability to rebuild without being forced to rely mostly on chance. |
|
Matt
Other 
Posts: 5,757
|
Post by Matt on Dec 19, 2015 15:46:53 GMT -5
After looking at some of the guys, any chance the numbers can get bumped up a little for some of them? Lots of 1s and 2s. I do understand that players take time to develop, but so many 1s aren't appealing  |
|
|
|
Post by CSCommish on Dec 19, 2015 16:06:57 GMT -5
After looking at some of the guys, any chance the numbers can get bumped up a little for some of them? Lots of 1s and 2s. I do understand that players take time to develop, but so many 1s aren't appealing That's one of the main things I am going to do tonight. |
|
|
|
Post by CSCommish on Dec 19, 2015 16:08:11 GMT -5
... perform more like their real life counterparts than staying by the system. But the system is based on real life counterparts... |
|
|
|
Post by CSCommish on Dec 19, 2015 16:15:29 GMT -5
Others get regular in game development plus we have protections for recent draftees.... Points to fix.... All these already help develop better prospects By chance. I'm talking about giving teams the ability to rebuild without being forced to rely mostly on chance. Not sure what you mean, what would you have done differently? Give me a specific example. |
|
|
|
Post by Boston Red Sox on Dec 19, 2015 17:00:14 GMT -5
By chance. I'm talking about giving teams the ability to rebuild without being forced to rely mostly on chance. Not sure what you mean, what would you have done differently? Give me a specific example. Well I'll use the one that I've mentioned before. A/G/A is not going to come close to replicating Tony Perez in real life. The rating system is wrong because the game values numbers differently. |
|
|
|
Post by CSCommish on Dec 19, 2015 17:05:06 GMT -5
How can the rating system be wrong? It's based on the numbers lol.
And I think it was even stated that Tony Perez was borderline, but given the reward system, we can afford to be conservative.
The irony is that he's now a stud because of a PD bump. But in real life, he's not a stud, he was a player who benefited from longevity.
|
|
|
|
Post by Boston Red Sox on Dec 19, 2015 17:06:57 GMT -5
Longevity doesn't exist in ootp5
|
|
|
|
Post by Boston Red Sox on Dec 19, 2015 17:10:27 GMT -5
The system is wrong because it's an old flawed game.
|
|
|
|
Post by CSCommish on Dec 19, 2015 17:22:44 GMT -5
Longevity doesn't exist in ootp5 That's why I give the longevity guys Durable injury rating, Good consistency and higher actual ratings. |
|
|
|
Post by CSCommish on Dec 19, 2015 18:34:18 GMT -5
Aside from Matt's comments, nothing else? I'm working on the actual ratings now, everything else will remain....
|
|
|
|
Post by Boston Red Sox on Dec 19, 2015 19:30:10 GMT -5
We should be paying attention to how long between draft and major league debut and rate accordingly. Ken Harrelson is an example of why.
|
|
|
|
Post by CSCommish on Dec 19, 2015 19:38:29 GMT -5
We should be paying attention to how long between draft and major league debut and rate accordingly. Ken Harrelson is an example of why. Agreed, but Ken Harrelson is not an example of it failing, it could be an example of luck or bad luck. If you have 100 other examples, then we need to fix something. |
|
|
|
Post by Boston Red Sox on Dec 19, 2015 19:42:07 GMT -5
But it is an example he was 22-23 and severely underrated for his age
|
|
Darryl
New Member
California Angels
Posts: 2,412
|
Post by Darryl on Dec 19, 2015 21:25:19 GMT -5
I already volunteered but thanks for offering and ignoring that fact like a complete asshole! Don't worry for the sake of the league i wouldn't let you near the draft. |
|
|
|
Post by Boston Red Sox on Dec 19, 2015 21:51:29 GMT -5
Fuck yourself I'm doing it. It was offered to me and the way you're acting is absolute disrespect.
|
|
Darryl
New Member
California Angels
Posts: 2,412
|
Post by Darryl on Dec 19, 2015 21:54:10 GMT -5
Fuck yourself I'm doing it. It was offered to me and the way you're acting is absolute disrespect. You talking about someone else being disrespectful that is hilarious. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 20, 2015 0:45:15 GMT -5
I'd prefer that Darryl do it. I'd actually probably make myself FIND time before I'd be too excited about Break doing it, nothing personal, just knowing his feelings and what he thinks he wants to do. I'm pretty sure that had Chris known Darryl was willing to do it all he wouldn't have offered it to you.
|
|
